Famous gay men in literature how to#
Today, it's hard to know just how to read those letters. "All sorts of people them wrong," he warned Fields. I think it's almost impossible for us to fully understand the way they saw these things back then." By 1911, there was enough awareness of homosexuality that when Fields pulled together a posthumous volume of Jewett's letters, editor Mark Antony DeWolfe Howe urged her to censor out the pet names. "For a Victorian person, that was not the case. "You have to remember, ever since Freud, we've viewed everything through this very sexualized lens," Wishart says. The other game changer was Sigmund Freud. After that, poetry about men sleeping together in the moonlight was never quite the same. It dictates and pervades great works of art, like those of Shakespeare and Michelangelo." But the newspapers focused instead on the salacious details, including Wilde's rumored visits to male prostitutes. Wilde did his best to defend same-sex love in the courtroom: "It is that deep spiritual affection that is as pure as it is perfect. In 1895, Wilde was convicted of sodomy and sentenced to two years in prison. So what changed between the days of the Boston marriage and the era of Gertrude Stein? For one thing, there was Oscar Wilde's trial. Women were perceived as being non-sexual to begin with, and most people assumed that if they didn't have husbands, they wouldn't have any interest in sex." "And it didn't necessarily occur to friends to wonder what their sex life was like. It made sense for them to seek out each other's company, says Wishart. The Massachusetts capital was filled with educated women from good families who could support themselves without the help of any man. This sort of arrangement wasn't uncommon at the time. (Jewett was "Pinney" and Fields was "Fuff.") The two women lived together, traveled to Europe together, and called each other pet names. "The thing we don't know about any of these people," says Peggy Wishart, "is the question most modern people have: Were they gay?" Wishart manages Historic New England's Sarah Orne Jewett House in South Berwick, Maine, which is hosting a lecture this weekend on the "Boston marriage." Jewett spent her later years in one of these ambiguous female partnerships, enjoying the almost constant companionship of Annie Fields, the widow of Atlantic editor James T. I knew I loved you, but you have left a larger void than I ever knew you filled." A few months later, Garfield wrote to Rhodes, "I would that we might lie awake in each other's arms for one long wakeful night." "Harry Dear, do you know how much I miss you? In the school - the church, at home, in labor or leisure - sleeping or waking, the want of your presence is felt. Garfield, wrote passionate notes to his college friend Harry Rhodes. The two men slept together in the same bed for four years, and Speed wrote to Lincoln in 1842, "You know my desire to befriend you is everlasting - I will never cease, while I know how to do any thing."Īnother American president, James A. That brotherly love certainly existed between Abraham Lincoln and his friend Joshua Speed. America was a young nation, a new nation, and there was a sense of brotherhood."
"Showing passion and affection was a more common part of the daily experience than it is today. "He even wants to exude a kind of sexuality toward the physical earth and the ocean." But it was more than that, as Reynolds explains. Reynolds, a CUNY graduate professor who specializes in 19th century American culture and has written several books on Whitman. "Certainly, in his poetry, Whitman tries to be omnisexual," says David S. "Limitless limpid jets of love hot and enormous, quivering jelly of love, white-blow and delirious juice.") ("Love-flesh swelling and deliciously aching," Whitman wrote, describing a bride and groom on their wedding night. When editors did censor Whitman's work, they left the "Calamus" poems intact and instead cut his descriptions of male-female passion. It's hard to imagine any modern poet writing about lying in another man's arms and then calling homosexuality "damnable." But the kind of same-sex intimacy Whitman described - and enjoyed in real life - was accepted at the time as a natural part of heterosexuality.
"That the calamus part has even allow'd the possibility of such construction as mention'd is terrible," Whitman responded, insisting that Symonds was making "morbid inferences - wh' are disavow'd by me & seem damnable."
The one I love most lay sleeping by me under the same cover in the cool night, In the stillness, in the autumn moonbeams, his face was inclined toward me, And his arm lay lightly around my breast - And that night I was happy.Īfter reading such passages, Symonds (who later wrote about his own sexual experiences with men) must have been disappointed by Whitman's reply.